Study: Fertility Treatment Outcomes Determined by Sperm Quality, Not Donor Age

by in fertility


Though former studies suggest donor age is crucial in achieving a satisfactory outcome during fertility treatments, a new study says otherwise. In fact, this new information, presented at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Annual Meeting in Munich, Germany, says it is sperm quality that determines the outcome of fertility treatments.

sperm

While it can be judged on a case by case basis, current guidelines in the UK state that sperm should not be taken from donors 41 years or older. And in the United States, most sperm banks require that donors be between the ages of 18 and 39; some even set that maximum age limit at 34.

Study co-author Dr. Navdeep Ghuman, of the Newcastle Fertility Centre at Life in the UK, and colleagues, says that those guidelines are based on past research – research that indicates older men are likely to have a lower sperm count, lower semen concentration and motility, and more DNA mutations than younger men. But the team says that none of these actually prevent conception.

The research team, led by Dr. Meenakshi Choudhary of the Newcastle Fertility Centre of Life, felt there wasn’t enough information regarding the association between age and sperm quality. And so, using data from the Human Fertilization & Embryology Authority, the team analyzed all fertility treatment cycles with sperm donation in the UK between 1991 and 2012. Of the 230,000 sperm donation cycles during that time period, researchers included 39,282 first cycles that were used in either in vitro fertilization (IVF) or donor insemination.

Since female fertility is known to decline with age, the team divided the female participants of the study into two age groups: those that were treated with donor sperm between the ages of 18 and 34, and those that were treated after the age of 37. The two groups were then divided again, depending on whether their treatment was through IVF or artificial insemination. Sperm donors were also divided into groups, based upon age. In total, there were six age groups: under 20, 21-25, 26-30, 31-35, 36-40, and 41-45.

Unsurprisingly, women that were treated with donor sperm after the age of 37 had a lower birth rate (14%) than those that were treated between the ages of 18 and 34 (29%). However, researchers did not find that sperm donor age affected the live birth rates among younger women who received donor sperm – 9.7% of live births resulting from sperm donors under 20 and 12% of births resulting from donors aged 41-45. And the difference in live birth rates among women that had received IVF varied little based on the age of the sperm donor – for women between ages 18-34, sperm donors under the age of 20 and 30 represented a live birth rate of 38.3% and donors aged 41-45 resulted in a live birth rate of 30.4%.

There was a different and rather surprising trend among women over 37 undergoing fertility treatment, however: younger sperm donors actually seemed less likely to produce successful treatment outcomes than older sperm donors.

Among the older women that underwent IVF, sperm donors under the age of 20 represented only 11% of live births, donors aged 26-30 represented a 17% live birth rate, and donors aged 41-45 represented a 16.6% live birth rate. Among older women undergoing artificial insemination, sperm donors under 20 represented a 3.1% live birth rate, while those aged 41-45 represented a 4.6% live birth rate.

“This trend of less likelihood of live birth with younger sperm donor age might simply be explained by the fact that younger men who donate sperm are less likely to have proven fertility themselves than older sperm donors with proven fertility,” Dr. Choudery told Medical News Today, adding that the decreased likelihood of conception among older women means the conception rate among older sperm donors is not statistically significant.

However, it does suggest that it is not donor age, but the quality of the sperm that determines whether or not pregnancy is achieved.

“Our result suggest that, up to the age of 45, there is little effect of male age on treatment outcome, but sperm donors are a selected population based on good sperm quality,” Choudery said. “Our study shows that we are good at selecting the right sperm donors with the right sperm quality – and that’s why we found no difference in live birth rate, despite the increasing age of sperm donors. This confirms the view that a man’s age doesn’t matter in achieving a live birth provided his sperm quality is good.”

Related Articles:

SOURCE




Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

About the Author

Kate Givans is a wife and a mother of five—four sons (one with autism) and a daughter. She’s an advocate for breastfeeding, women’s rights, against domestic violence, and equality for all. When not writing—be it creating her next romance novel or here on Growing Your Baby—Kate can be found discussing humanitarian issues, animal rights, eco-awareness, food, parenting, and her favorite books and shows on Twitter or Facebook. Laundry is the bane of her existence, but armed with a cup of coffee, she sometimes she gets it done. Find out more about Kate’s books at authorkategivans.com.

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.